Oct 8, 2020	Case: 20-CT-030801	Judge Peacock
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol and bloodshot/glassy eyes. The officer then requested that she perform numerous field sobriety tests. The officer alleged that she failed and she was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .163 and a .149 in the breath machine.
Defense:	In order to request field sobriety tests, the officer must have reasonable suspicion of a crime. In other words, there must be facts that would lead an officer to believe one was impaired by alcohol. Here, the observations made only led one to believe that she had consumed alcohol and not that she was impaired. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 7, 2020	Case: 20-CT-501549	Judge Swett
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and watery/bloodshot eyes. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk turn, and one leg stand field sobriety exercises. According the officer, she performed poorly and was arrested for DUI. She later refused the breath test.
Defense:	There was no video in the case. The firm pointed out to the State that the officer's reports contradicted each other as to many specifics of the defendant's performance on the field sobriety tests. Due to the conflicts in the reports, the officer's credibility was called into question.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 6, 2020	Case: 19-CT-015003	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. There was no odor of alcohol. The defendant's speech was slow and lethargic. He had constricted pupils, droopy eyelids, and slow speech. The officer believed he was impaired by drugs, and not alcohol. He performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later provided a urine sample which revealed positive results for numerous illegal non prescribed controlled substances.
Defense:	The defendant's video tape contradicted the officers written observations. Furthermore, the State couldn't prove that he was under the influence of those drugs that he tested positive for because the police never called a DRE (drug recognition officer) officer to do an evaluation.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 29, 2020	Case: 19-005732MU10A	Judge Carpenter-Toye
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for both speeding and weaving. The initial officer smelled a strong odor of alcohol and noticed bloodshot watery eyes. The defendant admitted to both drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana. After noticing that the defendant's pupils were dilated, he called for a DUI task force officer. Upon arrival, the task force officer made the same observations and began to conduct a DUI investigation. The defendant refused to perform any sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. A search of the vehicle revealed THC oil canisters as well as a vape pen. Throughout the investigation the officers insisted that the defendant had body tremors consistent with both marijuana use as well as high levels of alcohol intoxication.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton took independent statements (depositions) from the two officers. The statements were completely inconsistent with one another as well as with the video. Based on the inconsistencies by both officers the Prosecutor could not proceed to trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 23, 2020	Case: 20-CT-002962	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane. She had an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery/red eyes. She also had fumbling fingers and there was some vomit in the car. She refused to do the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The lawfulness of the traffic stop was called into question by the firm due to the fact that no other traffic was affected by her driving. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 22, 2020	Case: 20-CT-018465	Judge Babb
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving south bound in the north bound lane and speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he swayed while he stood. The defendant refused to do the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform roadside tests, the officer must advise the person of adverse consequences for refusing. If they do not, the refusal gets excluded from evidence. Here, the officer did not advise the defendant of any adverse consequences when he refused. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 15, 2020	Case: 19-CT-051810	Judge T. Brown
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The defendant had an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He admitted to consuming two drinks and his movements were slow and unsure. After performing field sobriety tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test), he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The description of the defendant's performance on the roadside tests was vaguely written with hardly any specifics. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 10, 2020	Case: 19-CT-002407	Judge Militello
Facts:	The defendant was stopped when officers observed her driving at a slow rate of speed and weaving. They observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. She was unsteady, swayed, and appeared confused. After performing several field sobriety tests, she was arrested for DUI. She later refused the breath test.
Defense:	Due to some conflicts between the reports and the video tape, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 9, 2020	Case: 19-CT-019691	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he admitted to having drank alcohol. He then performed numerous field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .093 and a .091 in the breath machine.
Defense:	With the .02 margin of error in the breath machine, the firm was able to place the defendant's breath alcohol results under the legal limit. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 9, 2020	Case: 20-CT-013607	Judge Jacobus
Facts:	The defendant was stopped coming out of a bar parking lot. According to the officer, his car lost traction and accelerated heavily. The officer observed an odor of alcohol and glassy eyes. The defendant admitted to having drank IPA beers. He then performed roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .08 and a .08 in the breath machine.
Defense:	In order to lawfully stop an individual, there must be probable cause to conduct the traffic stop. Here, since no traffic or pedestrians were affected by the defendant's actions of peeling out, the stop was unlawful. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 8, 2020	Case: 20-CT-000066	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving. He was straddling the lane markers and drifting from side to side. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and bloodshot eyes. He then performed field sobriety tests and the defendant was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .153 and a .139 in the breath machine.
Defense:	No traffic was affected by the defendant's driving and he was stopped very quickly. This called into question the lawfulness of the traffic stop. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 2, 2020	Case: AALGLIE	Judge Bedinghaus
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving erratically. He was driving slow, then fast, and also weaving. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he had trouble finding his drivers license. He stated he had drank tequila and beer. After performing the walk and turn and one leg stand tests, he was arrested for DUI.
Defense:	The police reports over exaggerated the defendant's level of impairment as compared to the police car dash cam video tape. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 2, 2020	Case: 2018-MM-001126	Judge Hamilton
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and she admitted to drinking alcohol. According to the officer she performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused the breath test.
Defense:	Before requesting field sobriety tests, an officer must have reasonable suspicion to believe that the defendant was impaired. There was only evidence the defendant had consumed alcohol. Here there was no erratic driving pattern nor any actual indicators of impairment. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 1, 2020	Case: 20-CT-001399	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, thick tongued speech, and watery eyes. He also had to lean on the vehicle for balance. After performing roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	On video, the firm pointed out to the State that the officer had the defendant do the walk and turn and one leg stand tests on the highway with cars speeding by and also the roadway had a very large slope. Under the NHTSA guidelines, roadside tests should be conducted on level surface. Thus, any impairment could have been equally attributed to the conditions on the road versus alcohol. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 1, 2020	Case: 20-CT-001820	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was stopped after almost striking an officer with his car. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, lethargic movements, and slurred speech. The defendant admitted to having drank alcohol. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The video tape contradicted many of the officer’s written reports. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 1, 2020	Case: 20-CT-003251	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for violating the move over law. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and lethargic movements. He had glassy eyes and admitting to having drank whiskey. He performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The lawfulness of the traffic stop was called into question and the defendant could not get over because there were other cars blocking him from doing so. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 27, 2020	Case: 19-CT-057710	Judge Peacock
Facts:	The defendant was passed out behind the wheel. When police awoke him, they observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He swayed while he stood and his dexterity was clumsy. He was arrested for DUI after performing several field sobriety tests. He later blew a .119 and a .108 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The defendant could not have been in actual physical control because one cannot have the capability of operating the motor vehicle while sleeping. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 27, 2020	Case: 19-CT-022104	Judge Damico
Facts:	The defendant was stopped by police as she was stuck on the railroad tracks trying to move her vehicle. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. She stumbled and needed help balancing herself. She also stated she had consumed several drinks. She performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she blew. a .181 and a .178 in the breath machine.
Defense:	There were issues as to whether the defendant was coerced into doing roadside tests at the scene. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 27, 2020	Case: 19-CT-016761	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was found by police parked in a parking lot after hours. The area had experienced many thefts. The officer then approached the defendant. He was asleep at the wheel. Upon awakening the defendant, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, he swayed, and was very off balance. The defendant refused roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test after vomiting.
Defense:	A high crime area alone doesn't give an officer "reasonable suspicion" of a crime to order a person to get out of their car. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 26, 2020	Case: 19-CM-013013	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant stated he had drank beers. The defendant then performed field sobriety tests and was subsequently arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The defendant had a pelvic hernia which was supported by medical documentation. Yet, the officer still had him do the one leg stand and walk and turn exercises. There was doubt whether any impairment was due to his injury versus alcohol. The State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.