Mar 18, 2019	Case: 2018-CT-000355AX	Judge Singer
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for straddling the center line. Once stopped, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he handed the deputy his passport instead of his drivers license. A DUI unit was called who made similar DUI observations. The defendant then performed the roadside tests. For example, on the walk and turn, he stepped off the line and missed heel to toe. On the one leg stand, he put his foot down. He was then arrested for DUI and later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The firm announced ready for trial. Just prior to trial, the firm pointed out numerous inconsistencies in the officer's reports. For example, he wrote the defendant stepped off the line many times which was in contradiction to the video. Also, the DUI officer concluded that the defendant was intoxicated per his report before he ever even got to the scene and came in contact with the defendant. The State Dropped the DUI on the day of trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 14, 2019	Case: 2018-CT-025559AXXX-XX	Judge Babb
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving, crashing his tire up against a curb, and nearly striking another vehicle. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery eyes, and he swayed while he stood. He stated he had drank three IPA beers and also exhibited confusion. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	There was no video tape or body worn camera. The defendant stated that the officer was exaggerating and not telling the truth so the firm pointed out numerous inconsistencies in the officer's reports and the vague description of the field sobriety tests to the State.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 13, 2019	Case: 2018-CT-019159	Judge Mcneil
Facts:	The defendant was found passed out in his car. Upon awakening the defendant, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and blood shot eyes. The defendant was unsteady and was not making sense. He performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest he refused a breath test.
Defense:	There was no reasonable suspicion of crime justifying ordering the defendant to roll down the windows upon awakening him. Thus, all the evidence would have been thrown out due to that initial illegality.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 7, 2019	Case: 2018-CM-007918	Judge Vogel for Judge Lefler
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving in the wrong lane of travel on a divided highway. The defendant was observed to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he admitted to having drank a shot and couple of beers. After performing the HGN/VGN (eyes tests), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. In a search incident to arrest, marijuana and paraphernalia were found and he was also charged with possession.
Defense:	The video contradicted the officers reports as to the specifics of the field sobriety tests. Prior to any trial, and after negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI and he also received no conviction on the possession charges.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 5, 2019	Case: 2018-CT-016852	Judge Vogel for Judge Lefler
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the road. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy/watery eyes, and slurred speech. He was slow to respond to questions and was lethargic. He performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .136 and a .130 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The video contradicted the officer's police reports in all aspects, from the driving pattern, observations, and through his performance on the field sobriety tests.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Mar 4, 2019	Case: M18-022571	Judge Alvarez-Zane
Facts:	The defendant's boat was stopped and boarded by police after an allegation of careless boating. The defendant was the boat captain and there were at least 4 other passengers on the boat. Officers noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he fumbled with his items. He also was off balance and avoided eye contact. He then performed several field sobriety tests such as the palm pat, hand coordination, and finger to nose tests. According to the officer, he failed and was arrested for boating under the influence. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The firm listed everyone who was on the defendant's chartered boat that day. They all stated that they told the police he was not drinking at all. They all came to court and told the State he was not drinking as he was the boat captain. The officers reports were vague and contradictory. The State Dismissed the DUI.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Feb 26, 2019	Case: 2018-MM-010001	Judge Herr
Facts:	A call went out about a disturbance at a bar. When police arrived, they found the defendant sitting in his car. Upon being asked to step out, they observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He then performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .196 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The officers never took any steps to verify the veracity of the call prior to ordering the defendant out of the car. Thus, there was no reasonable suspicion of a crime justifying ordering him out of the car.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 22, 2019	Case: 2018-CT-032662AXXX	Judge Atkin
Facts:	A homeowner called the police in the middle of the night after they saw an unknown vehicle parked in their yard. When the police arrived, they found the defendant passed out on the ground by the rear driver's side tire. He was the only person in the area and it was his car. They observed him to have an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he staggered upon waking up. His speech was not understandable and he could not form complete sentences. The only roadside test that was conducted was HGN (eye test) because the defendant was so drunk. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .225 and a .212 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress. In our motion, we alleged that the defendant's arrest was unlawful. Pursuant to Florida Statute 901.15, when there is an arrest for a misdemeanor, and no crash, the officer must observe all elements of the crime. Here, the officers did not observe the defendant driving or in actual physical control which is the first element of a DUI. Prior to any motion being argued, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 20, 2019	Case: 18-CT-017207	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and she admitted to having drank alcohol. She performed poorly on the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she blew a .183 and a .176 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The firm pointed out that the driving pattern did not rise to the level of any reasonable suspicion of a crime to believe she was an impaired driver. Even though he had a camera, there was no video of the driving pattern to corroborate his police reports.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 20, 2019	Case: 18-CT-013525	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for stopping over the stop bar and weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and bloodshot eyes. He then performed poorly on the roadside tests according to the officer and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .154 and a .149 the breath machine.
Defense:	The video of the defendant's field sobriety tests contradicted the police reports. The defendant's videotaped performance on the roadside tests also clearly showed that he was absorbing alcohol and lower at the time of driving.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 20, 2019	Case: 18-CT-016374	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was found asleep in his car in his driveway. Calls had gone out that the defendant had been involved in a crash. When officers arrived and awoke the defendant, they observed an odor of alcohol, vomit, and slurred speech. The defendant refused to perform all the roadside tests other than HGN (eye test). The defendant was arrested for DUI and later refused the breath test.
Defense:	Prior to ordering the defendant to roll down his window and exit the car, the officers never checked for damage. In fact, there was no damage. Thus, there was no reasonable suspicion of a crime to lawfully justify ordering the defendant out of his car.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 19, 2019	Case: 18-CT-017423	Judge Palomino for Judge Lefler
Facts:	The defendant was found by police passed out and slumped over the wheel. After waking the defendant, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and a blank/dazed look. He also had vomit all over himself, poor balance, mumbled speech, and sleepy movements. No roadside tests were conducted for safety purposes and he was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a. 139 and a .135 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The defendant was not in actual physical control because he had no capability of operating the vehicle while sleeping.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 15, 2019	Case: 9937-XEX	Judge Barket
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for having an illegal window tint. The officer who made the traffic stop observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and slow /lethargic movements. He also observed blood shot eyes and the defendant had trouble finding his documents. The defendant refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The officers involved in the case contradicted themselves. For example, the officer with the defendant at the station stated there was no slurred speed and indicated nothing about lethargic movements. Also, the time frame when the defendant allegedly refused to perform roadside tasks was not captured on the body worn cameras. No one could answer why with any reasonable explanation. Also, the body worn cameras contradicted the officers observations in the reports.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 15, 2019	Case: 2018-CT-503989	Judge George
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for making an illegal turn. Once stopped, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and she admitted to having drank 3 beers. She used her door for support and had difficulty balancing. She performed poorly on the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she blew a .093 and a .089 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Due to the .02 margin of error in the breath machine, the firm was able to place the defendant's two breath test results under the legal limit. This was pointed out to the State and they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 14, 2019	Case: 18-CT-010273	Judge Palomino for Judge Lefler
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and mumbled/slurred speech. He had trouble following instructions on the HGN (eye test). The defendant then refused all further roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	Prior to trial, the State Dropped the DUI. The video contradicted the police reports. The defendant speech appeared normal and he was responsive and coherent.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 12, 2019	Case: 18-CT-002680	Judge Alijewicz
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a multiple car crash. When officers arrived, they observed the defendant to appear as if he was on drugs. He was disoriented, confused, and appeared loopy. The defendant was administered Narcan to reverse the overdose effects of opiates. He was then taken to the hospital. Before they could treat him, he left and was stopped by police while walking down the road. The police requested a blood draw. The blood later tested positive for Fentanyl and Xanax. He was subsequently charged with DUI.
Defense:	In order to ask for blood outside of a hospital, when a breath test is not impractical or impossible, a defendant must be told the blood is being offered as an alternative to breath and/or urine. Here, that was not the case and the blood would have been excluded.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 1, 2019	Case: 19-CT-001773	Judge Cameron
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain s single lane. He was alleged to have traveled over the fog lines. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, and red/glassy eyes. He had to steady himself while getting out of the car. He then performed various field sobriety tests such as the walk and turn, finger to nose and HGN (eye test). He was then arrested for DUI and later refused the breath test.
Defense:	The officers who stopped the defendant were outside their jurisdiction. The State did not provide what is called a mutual aid agreement between the two cities authorizing one jurisdiction to conduct traffic stops in the other's jurisdiction. In addition, the officers had body worn cameras but did not video any roadside tests for whatever unknown reason. The State Dropped the DUI, and the defendant, who is a CDL license holder, received No criminal conviction on his record.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 29, 2019	Case: 18-016175MU10A	Judge Levy
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he admitted to having consumed a couple of beers. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew .094 and a .093 in breath machine.
Defense:	The firm announced ready for trial. The defendant took the breath test over 90 minutes after being stopped. The State could not prove whether or not he was over the legal limit at the time of driving. In addition, with the. 02 margin of error on each breath result, the defense was able to place the defendant under the legal limit. On the day of trial, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 29, 2019	Case: A70ARUE	Judge Vaccaro
Facts:	The defendant was found sleeping in his car in an apartment building parking lot. Upon waking the defendant, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he had a dazed/confused look. He performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton announced ready for jury trial. Days before trial, the defense pointed out to the State that the defendant was not in actual physical control because he had no capability of operating the vehicle. He was not only sleeping, but the defense also pointed out that the keys were on the passenger seat. The day before trial, the State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.