Feb 10, 2015	Case: 14-CT-505072	Judge Mann
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and failing to maintain a single lane. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol from his breath, slow/slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant stated he had just come from a nightclub and had consumed a few drinks. He showed several signs of intoxication on the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton had pretrial discussions with the State Attorney's Office prior to setting a trial date which led to them dropping the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 9, 2015	Case: 2014-CF-013385000AHC	Judge Fernandez
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and she appeared unsteady on her feet. According to the officer, she failed the video taped roadside tests. She was then arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she blew a .143 and .149 in the breath machine. The defendant was eventually charged by the State with a Third Degree Felony DUI due to the fact this was her Third DUI within ten years of her last DUI conviction.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress the breath test results. In our motion, we alleged that on the video tape at the breath testing facility, the arresting officer was giving legal advice to the defendant. Thus, he was misleading her, providing misinformation, and coercing her into taking a breath test. We also pointed out that the defendant's performance on the video taped field sobriety tests contradicted the police reports. Prior to trial and the motion ever being heard, the State Dropped the Felony DUI all the way down to a Misdemeanor Reckless Driving.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI to a reckless driving.

Feb 6, 2015	Case: 2014-CT-022518	Judge Atkin
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the road. The defendant stated he had spilled a beer in the car while driving which caused him to swerve. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. He was also unsteady on his feet. According to the arresting officer, the defendant did not perform up to standards on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the officer had a working in car video camera on scene. However, the officer did not videotape the defendant performing the roadside tests as the camera was on, but facing in a different direction. Thus, no one could see how the defendant actually performed.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 6, 2015	Case: 2014-CT-029576	Judge Silverman
Facts:	The defendant was involved in a one car crash. His car ended up mounted upon a concrete wall in a construction area. When the officers arrived, they noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, mumbled speech, bloodshot eyes, and a flushed face. The defendant also appeared very unsteady. The defendant explained to the officer how the crash had occurred, talked about his intoxicated state, and that he knew he was drunk. He refused to perform the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress the defendant's alleged statements. In our motion, we alleged that the officer never read the defendant his Miranda rights. Thus, the accident report privilege was violated. We also filed a motion to suppress the defendant's refusal to give a breath test based the fact that the officer misstated the law. Finally, on the entire video tape at the scene, you never hear the defendant stating "he knew he was drunk" or anything about him talking about his level of intoxication as the officer wrote in his report.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 5, 2015	Case: 2014-CT-139226	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving and his rear brake light was inoperable. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. According to the officer, the defendant was trying to conceal the odor of alcohol by wearing extra cologne and using breath mints. After performing the field sobriety tests on video tape, the defendant was arrested for DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton had negotiations with the State just prior to trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 5, 2015	Case: CTC147422XFGASP	Judge Overton
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol and blood shot eyes. According to the officer, the defendant swayed and staggered upon exiting the car. He also admitted to consuming three beers. The defendant performed the field sobriety tests on video tape and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .084 and .085 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton conducted pre-trial negotiations with the State about dropping the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 5, 2015	Case: 2014-CT-122587	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The police were called to investigate the defendant based on the fact he was causing a disturbance and was intoxicated. When officers arrived, they spotted the defendant's car and followed him. They noticed him weaving and driving on the grass median. Once stopped, the officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and he swayed while standing outside the car. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the police reports were very vaguely written. Also, the officer's camera was not working at the scene so no tests were video taped.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 4, 2015	Case: 2014-CT-02023-A-K	Judge Fowler
Facts:	The defendant drove up to an officer on his motorcycle in a parking lot to ask if the officer could spare some gasoline. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, glassy eyes, and an "abnormal gait." According to the officer, he failed the video taped field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .082 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton had pre-trial negotiations with the prosecutor a couple weeks before the trial date. We pointed out that the video tape contradicted the officer's reports. Also, we pointed out that with the margin of error on breath testing, the defendant's .082 result could have been below the legal limit.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Feb 2, 2015	Case: 2014-MM-007920A	Judge Schott
Facts:	The defendant was found by the police passed out in his car in a bar / shopping center parking lot. A 911 caller alerted police to his car by stating he had been passed out for about three hours. When officers arrived, they awoke the defendant. The officer smelled an odor of alcohol, noticed slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. The defendant stated he had a couple of beers a few hours ago. According to the officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He refused the breath test after his arrest. This was the defendant's third DUI arrest.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton announced ready for trial. We pointed out to the State that the defendant's field sobriety test performance on video contradicted the officer's written reports. Also, we pointed out that a person who is sleeping in a car cannot be in "actual physical control" as they have no "capability" of operating the vehicle while sleeping. On the day of jury trial, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 30, 2015	Case: 2014-CT-001246-E	Judge Wilson
Facts:	The defendant was allegedly involved in a side swipe crash. When the police arrived, they noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and slurred speech. He swayed as he stood outside the car. According to the officer, he failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .171 and .157 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State prior to trial that there were three people in the defendant's car at the time of the crash. We talked with the State and also pointed out that the alleged victim in the crash could not properly identify the defendant as the driver based on statements and her description. Thus, the State could not place the defendant in actual physical control as the driver at the time of the crash.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 27, 2015	Case: 13-023560MM10A	Judge Pole
Facts:	The defendant was originally observed by a civilian witness crashing into a posted "no u-turn" sign. The witness subsequently contacted the police. When the deputy located the defendant he noticed the defendant 's tires spinning despite being in a stopped position. The officer approached the vehicle and observed a strong odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes as well as slurred speech. In addition, the defendant's movements were extremely lethargic throughout the investigation. Upon exiting the car, the defendant was seen stumbling while walking and swaying while standing. The defendant refused all testing and was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's third DUI.
Defense:	The original civilian failed to provide their personal information. Therefore, the law considers that person to be at the low end of the reliability scale as far as the information they provide. In order to prove a lawful stop the officer needed to be able to corroborate some type of driving infraction. Spinning tires is not enough to lawfully stop a vehicle. Despite the fact that this was the defendant's 3rd offense for DUI, after taking testimony from the officers, the State could not proceed.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 27, 2015	Case: 13-020017MM10A	Judge Solomon
Facts:	The defendant was involved in a crash. She hit a barrier wall and also smashed into a another car. The officers observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, mush mouthed speech, and watery eyes. The police observed her to sway, appear unsteady, and also have a blank stare. The defendant admitted to consuming 3 beers and 3 shots. According to the officers, she failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she blew a .109 and .107 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton announced ready for trial. On the day of trial, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 26, 2015	Case: 7939-XEM	Judge Hague
Facts:	The defendant rear ended another car. The officers observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. According to the officers, he failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .153 and .152 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton announced ready for trial. On the morning of trial, the State could not place the defendant in "actual physical control" of the motor vehicle.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Jan 20, 2015	Case: 2014-CT-026549AXXX	Judge Weiss
Facts:	The defendant was found passed out behind the wheel of his car by the police. The car was running and the transmission was in drive. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. The defendant stated he had drank some "Kahlua" earlier in the day and had no answer for the officer as to why he was asleep in the roadway. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. The officer believed the defendant was actually impaired by a controlled substance and not alcohol after concluding his investigation.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that there was no evidence of what "specific" controlled substance the officer believed was impairing the defendant as required by Florida Statutes.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Jan 8, 2015	Case: 14-CT-121830	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding, cutting across lanes of traffic, and following other cars too close causing them to brake. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred/mumbled speech, and watery eyes. The defendant was unsteady on his feet and was making unusual statements. After performing the HGN (eye test), he refused to perform any other tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton had pretrial negotiations with the State a couple of weeks prior to the trial date.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 8, 2015	Case: 2014-CT-011400-O	Judge Miller
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, a flushed face, and bloodshot eyes. When the defendant was asked how much he had drank, he responded by saying "not much." He then told the officer he had one drink. The defendant refused to perform the field sobriety tests even after being advised of the adverse consequences. He was then arrested for DUI and subsequently refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton had immediate pretrial discussions with the prosecutor within weeks after the defendant's arrest. At the first pretrial court hearing, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 8, 2015	Case: 2014-CT-024198AXXX-XX	Judge Koons
Facts:	The defendant was found by the police after his car went into a ditch. The defendant stated he had a coughing attack which caused him to drive off the road. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and was unsteady on his feet. The officer also observed the defendant to be clumsy, unsure, fumbling around, a pale face, and disarranged clothing. The defendant was read his Miranda rights and stated he wanted an attorney. According to the officer, he refused to perform the roadside tests and was was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's second dui arrest. The entire event at the scene was captured on video tape.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress all the evidence based on a lack of probable cause to make the arrest. In our motion. we alleged numerous factors pointing out inconsistencies between the officer's reports versus the video tape. For example, on video the defendant was never asked to perform roadside test even though it was written in the police report. Also, the defendant's speech was normal, his face was actually red, not pale, and his clothes were not disarranged. The defendant was also never off balance or unsteady and was responsive and coherent. Prior to the motion being heard, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jan 8, 2015	Case: 14-CM-009517	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was detained by the police after he rear ended another car in a parking lot. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery eyes. The defendant admitted to having a couple of shots of alcohol. According to the officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests. He was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .089 in the breath machine. The defendant was also charged with possession of marijuana and paraphernalia that was found in the car after his arrest for DUI.
Defense:	Prior to trial, Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the officer's observations in the reports contradicted the defendant's field sobriety test performance on the video tape. The State then Dropped the DUI. The drug charges were dismissed under the theory of a lack of constructive possession.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Dec 15, 2014	Case: 2014-CT-001346-E	Judge Blechman
Facts:	The defendant was involved in a single car crash. When the officers arrived, they noticed the defendant to be unsteady, have bloodshot eyes, lethargic movements, and slurred speech. Although the officers did not smell any alcohol, they felt he was impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance. According to the officers, he exhibited several cues of impairment on the field sobriety tests and was then arrested for DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that there was no specific evidence by which the State could prove that the defendant was impaired by a specific chemical and/or controlled substance as required by Florida law.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.