May 13, 2013	Case: 0355-XFE	Judge Altfield
Facts:	The defendant crashed his car off the road into a light pole and several trees. Fire rescue arrived, treated the defendant, and transported him to the hospital where the police then met him. At the hospital, the defendant admitted to the officers to taking Ambien and smoking marijuana just before driving his car. He also stated that he felt the drugs "kicking in." The officers had him perform field sobriety tests which he failed at the hospital. The defendant was requested to provide a blood sample to which he complied. He was then arrested for DUI (controlled and/or chemical substance) and taken to the jail. The blood work was then sent off to the toxicology lab for analysis.
Defense:	On the morning of jury trial, Parks & Braxton pointed out that the State had violated the discovery rules by not providing the toxicology lab results in a timely fashion. The speedy trial time frame had run out on the State to bring the defendant to trial.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

May 13, 2013	Case: 2013-CT-002196-A-O-X	Judge Barlow
Facts:	The defendant was found by police passed out behind the wheel of her car at an intersection. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot-eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant performed field sobriety tests on video tape and showed numerous signs of intoxication. She also admitted drinking numerous glasses of champagne. She even fell down at one point on tape. She was then arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton announced ready for trial and were prepared the morning the case was set.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 10, 2013	Case: 2013-CT-001645-O-X	Judge Bigney
Facts:	The defendant crashed her car into a utility pole. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and slow speech. She also appeared dazed and confused. The defendant also stated she had a few drinks. According to the officer, she performed very poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State prior to trial that they would have a difficult time placing the defendant in "actual physical control" of the car at the time of the crash based on the reports.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 8, 2013	Case: CT-006654-XFA	Judge Dominguez
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. The officer who arrived, observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slow/slurred speech, blood-shot eyes, and he appeared unsteady. The defendant started to perform the walk and turn exercise and then stopped. He then refused to perform the rest of the field sobriety tests and was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton prepared for trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 6, 2013	Case: 2012-CT-013107-AXXX	Judge Cofer
Facts:	The defendant's friend was stopped by police for speeding and running a stop sign while driving the defendant's van. The defendant's friend stopped the van, and the officer observed her jump into the back seat. As the officer approached, our client then moved over to the driver's seat in order to provide the officer with the vehicle documentation since it was her van. The officer was aware that the original driver who was now in the back of the van was the original driver and our client was the original passenger. Upon making contact with our client, the officer noticed the keys were in the ignition and engine was running. He observed our client to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, blood-shot eyes, and trouble maintaining her balance. The defendant admitted to drinking and feeling buzzed. She performed very poorly on the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI, as was her friend who was highly intoxicated (the original driver) who jumped into the back seat. After our client's arrest for DUI, she blew a .163 and .159 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton announced ready for trial. On the morning of trial, as well as before hand, the firm pointed out to the state that our client could not be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while she was being detained by law enforcement. Also, the in dash police car video tape had been destroyed which would have captured the entire traffic stop.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 2, 2013	Case: 4880-XEM	Judge Newman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for obstructing traffic. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot-eyes, and slurred speech. According to the officer, she failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the roadside report describing the defendant's alleged performance was very vague with hardly any details. The firm was ready for trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 30, 2013	Case: 2013-CT-002166--A-O-X	Judge Barlow
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and the defendant admitted drinking two beers. According to the officers, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. Although he tested positive for alcohol on the breath machine, the officers concluded he was impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance versus alcohol after completing their entire investigation.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that they could not prove by which specific chemical and/or controlled substance impaired the defendant as required by Florida law.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 30, 2013	Case: 2012-CT-011431AXXX	Judge Bryson
Facts:	The defendant was seen by an officer pulling into a parking space in a shopping center. The officer observed him pulling in very crooked into the parking space. He watched the defendant stumble out of the car and then saw him lose his balance and sway while walking towards the store. When the defendant came out, the officer went up to him and asked "if he was ok" and noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol on his breath, slurred speech, a flushed face, and glassy eyes. He then called for a DUI unit. The DUI officer arrived with an in car camera and asked the defendant to perform field sobriety tests to which the defendant refused. The defendant also admitted to having five drinks. He was then arrested for DUI and after his arrest he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton took pre-trial sworn depositions of the two officers involved in the case. At the depositions, the two officers contradicted each other on what they observed. For example, one stated the defendant was totally off balance versus the other who said he never observed anything like that. All there depositions, reports, along with the video tape were conflicting.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 29, 2013	Case: 4967-XEM	Judge Seraphin
Facts:	The defendant was found passed out behind the wheel of his car by police in the middle of the roadway. The defendant's car engine was running. Officers observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. He was unsteady once outside the car and he seemed confused. The defendant refused to perform the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton were ready for trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 26, 2013	Case: 11-015665MM10A	Judge Gottlieb
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving 93MPH in a 40MPH zone while almost colliding into other vehicles. The initial officer observed a strong odor of alcohol, flushed face as well as slurred speech. He then requested another officer to conduct the DUI investigation. Upon arrival, the DUI officer made the same observations as the initial officer. The officer asked the defendant to perform field sobriety exercises. The defendant replied "I'm not giving you the rope to hang me". During the conversation, the defendant was swaying and extremely unsteady on his feet. The report indicated that the defendant was placed in handcuffs and arrested for DUI refusal. This was the defendant's 3rd DUI.
Defense:	Despite the fact that this was the defendant's 3rd DUI, he had never refused a breath test in the past. As a result, the DUI refusal statute did not apply to the defendant. In deposition, the officer admitted to requesting a breath test prior to the arrest. As a result, Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress based on an improper request for a breath test. The State stipulated to the motion.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 26, 2013	Case: 9237-FXC	Judge Wolfson
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding in a school zone. The officer observed the defendant's car to have an odor of marijuana coming from the interior and the defendant's eyes were red and droopy. According to the officer, she failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI (impairment by a controlled substance). A urine test was requested and the defendant tested positive for marijuana at the toxicology lab.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that there was no odor of marijuana coming from the defendant's breath and they could not prove how long the marijuana had been in her body based on just the lab report.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 24, 2013	Case: 12-259MM10A	Judge Solomon
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving over the lane markers, driving past the stop bar, almost striking the median and careless driving. The Sgt. smelled a strong odor of alcohol, and admitted coming from a bar. The officer then observed a flushed face and bloodshot eyes. The defendant ultimately stated that he had 5-6 Heinekens. The defendant was asked to perform several field sobriety exercises. He replied "C'mon man, we all make mistakes". Can't you cut me a break"? He then stated "If I do these tests, you're gonna see that I'm over the limit". The defendant was arrested for DUI and refused a breath test. Because the defendant had a prior refusal to submit to a breath test, he was also charged with refusal to submit. This was the defendant's 3rd DUI.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress based on the officer's failure to properly advise our client during the DUI investigation. The motion was granted and the evidence was excluded.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 24, 2013	Case: CT-001950-XES	Judge Courtney
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, he appeared sleepy, belching, and a flushed face. His movements were slow and clumsy at the car in addition to not making eye contact with the officer. Upon exiting the car, the defendant staggered and was unsteady. He also swayed while standing outside the car. He refused to perform the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's second DUI arrest.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that even though the arresting officer had a working video camera in his car at the scene the entire time, the officer never placed the defendant in front of the camera until the defendant was placed under arrest. Thus, none of the DUI observations he allegedly observed off camera could be seen by anyone and were only written in the reports.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 22, 2013	Case: 2012-CT-005443-A-O	Judge Barlow
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving on the rim of his tires and weaving. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, red eyes, slurred speech, and he stated he had consumed 2-3 drinks. He also used the sidewalk rail for balance when outside his car. On video tape, the defendant performed very poorly on the roadside tests where he displayed numerous signs of impairment. He was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pre-trial motion to suppress the field sobriety tests. In our motion, we alleged the defendant was "coerced" into performing the tests based on statements made by the officer to the defendant on video tape. The Judge Granted the motion and threw out all of the roadside tests.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 19, 2013	Case: 2012-CT-031364AXXX	Judge Hanser
Facts:	The defendant was stopped by the police at a roadblock checkpoint. Officers noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, blood-shot eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant admitted to drinking beer. According to the officers, he failed the video taped field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the mandatory written set of roadblock guidelines created by the police in this case violated the Florida Supreme Court requirements. Also, the firm pointed out to the State that none of the defendant's normal faculties were impaired on video tape as originally written by the officer.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Apr 17, 2013	Case: CT-008098-XCM	Judge Myers
Facts:	The defendant was found by the police passed out at a green light with his foot on the break, snoring, and his car in the drive position. Upon waking the defendant, the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, thick tongued speech, and glassy eyes. The defendant was very unsteady once outside the car. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that almost the entire police car video tape of the defendant at the scene had been destroyed, corrupted, and/or deleted.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 17, 2013	Case: CT-005720-XGA	Judge McNeil
Facts:	The defendant was the at-fault driver in a rear-end crash. The officer who arrived on the scene noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, watery eyes, and appeared to be unsteady. The defendant also admitted to drinking beer. The defendant refused to perform the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that even though the police had a video camera at the scene, they never video taped the defendant.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 11, 2013	Case: 9377-XEQ	Judge Newman
Facts:	The defendant was found by police when his car was stuck in the gravel surrounding the railroad tracks. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, mumbled speech, a flushed face, and blood-shot eyes. He admitted to drinking 3-4 16 ounce beers and also admitted to being buzzed. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest for DUI, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton were ready for trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Apr 3, 2013	Case: CT-004792-XGA	Judge McNeil
Facts:	The defendant was stopped by the police after almost crashing into the back of police car which was on another traffic stop. Officers noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, blood-shot eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant admitted to drinking beer that night. According to the officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the defendant had a prosthesis on his left arm, which was noted in the reports, and that his balance was affected because of the weight difference on each side of his body due to the prosthesis.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.